Green Building Forum

Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine Subscription  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Your Cart  5  Register
Warmcell slump! - Green Building Forum

Hello

Welcome to the Green Building Forum. Reading any of the public conversations is free but if you want to join in the discussions then you need to register first to obtain a code for which there is a small charge. Please follow the link on the left. OR:

GREEN BUILDING MAGAZINE
Get the next four copies of this fantastic magazine delivered directly to your door.
1 year Green Building magazine subscription
Price: £20.00
Discount books available with subscription:


Warmcell slump!

Rex
edited May 2009 in Housing - New Build
Hi there,

Our new house will have 180mm of sprayed Warmcell as the external insulation.

However, in the factory, one of the panels was, unbeknown to me, filled with Warmcell and sealed. During the shell erection, the panels got wet, and this one panel has remained very damp at its base. Owning to electrical first fix, I needed to cut a hole and that is when I discovered it was filled, now with very damp Warmcell.

To assist in drying, I have removed the OSB and found that behind, the Warmcell had seriously slumped and compacted at the base. I will be refilled when the whole house is insulated, but I am concerned about the slumping.

I would hate to think that the insulation will slump and I will be left with uninsulated areas in the future.

What is the experience of forum members?

Many thanks in advance,

Rex
«1

Comments

  • This problem has already sadly been talked about on here. It is a known about downside of the system.
  • Can you give me a link to the discussion. Searching from above gives only two results, and this is one of them!

    Rex
  • Don't know how much of a problem future potential slump can/will be.

    It occurred this time, I believe, because the panel got very wet during the Jan snow. The Warmcell got wet and its weight compressed it to the base of the panel. If it is not wet, then surely this should not
    happen.

    Rex
  • Gravity over time will generally have an effect and there ain't no anti gravity machines yet.
  • Exactly Tony. It all hinges on density I think but frankly given time, I believe that even installed at the correct density, it will slump.

    I like cellulose fibre but it needs to be used with full knowledge of its likely limitations.
  • Rex - I would speak to the technical people at Excel - they are usually fairly useful. I think you're saying that the warmcel was damp sprayed. I think this method (as opposed to dry blown) does take a long time to dry out. An installer told me a week before boarding it but once it's boarded it can take months to dry completely. I can imagine in a timber frame factory they may have boarded it in too much of a hurry. But certainly if it got wet in the snows it may have become wetter than when it was installed. When it goes in it is only slightly moist and the surface soon dries (in the right conditions) and holds everything together. If allowed to dry somewhat before boarding - and once dry - slumping shouldn't be a problem. What is the inside lined with? Is it paneline or OSB?

    Tony and Keith - slumping generally seems to occurr when the moisture content is not at the optimum. For example first thing in the morning when the machine starts up and too much water goes in.But it happens early on and can be topped up before boarding. It is generally only in one or two voids. The stuff once dry is almost as stiff as the paper pulp used to make egg boxes. I don't feel gravity is going to compress it enough any more than it will do for comparable insualtion such as glasswool or wool.
  • Just provide plenty of crosswise things for the Warmcel to catch onto - like 170x50 studs crossbattened with 70x50s, gives 240 insulation thickness, negligible thermal bridging compared to e.g. 245x50 studs or even web-beam studs, and no chance of slumping.
  • Rex,
    There's a load of research into installation of cellulose fiber insulation. The main thing is to get the pressure right when it's blown in place. If it is done correctly, and kept dry, then it should not slump. Warmcell should have plenty of data on this and it should inform the performance specifications they can provide.

    Mark
  • Thanks for the various replies.

    I will talk with Excel about this, but of course, they are likely to say there should not be a problem.

    The one panel was probably filled dry int he workshop, but wet entered during the snow and rain when we only had the gf panels standing vertically.

    The panels are all PanelLine (or is it Vent?) on the outside, so should be breathable.

    Some of the panels have a have structural noggin so the possible slump height is about 1.2m, but many do not. Am thinking of fitting a few noggins (2x1) to give something for the Warmcel to 'sit' on.

    Our Warmcel will be 180mm deep, damp sprayed. I am not too concerned about the damp spraying, since there is a difference between damp and wet!

    Rex
  • Hi Rex,I'm the technical director for Warmcel products and I've been reading this blog thread and thought I should step in and see if I can shed some light on the situation.

    I'm sorry to hear about your problems with Warmcel. In our experience on building sites and when tested by external institutes such as TRADA, Warmcel doesn't settle when exposed to extreme levels of climatic humidity or vibration as long as it is installed within the guidleines set out in our manuals.

    The key to optimum performance is that Warmcel should be installed to the correct density, whilst ensuring the panels don't get soaked in the rain.

    Your comments regarding the difference between damp spray and wet are indeed correct. Warmcel can cope with damp conditions due to its breathable properties. Indeed, the damp spray application technique works well and studies performed in the Building Research Establishment (BRE) hygrothermal chamber have consistently demonstrated that the panels dry to below the maximum moisture threshold for timber within 30 days of closing off the panel with a vapour control layer. However,Warmcel, like many other types of insulation product should be kept away from exposure to rain.

    Warmcel is only sold into the UK for new build timber frame constructions to approved installer.

    I hope that this reassures you. Feel free to contact me at any time should you require any further information or assistance.

    Many thanks

    Neil
  • I have a question.

    Could you use a vibrating poker (a la concrete pouring) to settle the warmcell when it's blown into voids. Would this greatly reduce it's insulating properties or maybe even improve them?

    What does the panel think?
  • Neil,

    Thanks for you comments. I will be going with Warmcell, if for no other reason than all the SAP calculations are based upon it. Change the insulation and everything changes.

    The problem I am having right now is two fold. I have 180mm stud to be filled by damp spray. Or so i was told by the t/f manufacturer. But they went into liquidation and I can find no-one who recommends spraying into 180mm. Most recommend 150mm max. So what to do?

    I have been advised to board and dry fill, then batten and put the drylining up. This would create a 1" service void which I do not want.

    Then there is the issue of a vapour membrane. I was told that the Paneline/PanelVent construction did not need one, so I have not planned for it. But the general consensus seems to be, put one in. Again, what to do?

    Your recommendations would be greatly appreciated.

    Thanks,

    Rex
  • We're going for 25cm dry blown cellulose for a new build in Spain. The company said that they cannot do damp sprayed beyond 160mm because it would take too long to dry. The wall construction will be blocks on both sides of cellulose, no ventilated cavity and no vapour membrane.
  • I was recommended to apply scrim, cross battens and then drylining board before the dry Warmcell installation.

    The problem with this is the number of spaces that will have to be filled by the Warmcell. Additionally, the nature of the t/f construction has so many vertical narrow spaces (5cms), and noggins dividing normal cavities into two, that it would not be possible to inject Warmcell into them, or know where they are once the drylining is in place. Warmcell would require in injection hole in every space and that will be a lot of work restoring.



    I have been told by various Warmcell companies that the drying of damp Warmcell is not a major issue; the issue is that the deeper the wall, the greater the difficulty of keeping the Warmcell in place. 150mm seems to be the max that most companies will spray. Excel say that 180mm is just fine if the applicators feel happy with doing it. The company that will be doing it are fine; they say they have done it before (but they would say that , won't they?)

    Regarding the service void, although I have plenty of space, I really don't want to loose another 1" all around the house. I'm not against a service void, but all the services are now in place so I would have an empty void for no apparent reason. Additionally, if the dryling board is in contact with the Warmcell, there will not be a void to provide a 'hollow' sound.

    To help with drying, I can always hire a dehumidifier for a week or two.

    In retrospect (or on the next build!) I would probably go with factory installed Warmcell, service void and inuslate that void. However, the t/f company did inject Warmcell inot one panel (they cannot explain why) and no-one seems to have know about it. During the shell erection, this panel (along with everything else) go wet. As it was not protected, the Warmcell became a giant sponge. I did not know about this until the first fix, which prompt this thread.

    Imagine if the whole house had been factory filled and the tops of the wall not protected! Since the t/f company went into liquidation, I would really have been up the creek without a paddle.

    The restructured t/f company have told me that it is the shell erectors who should protect the tops of the panels from rain, but I don't know who is passing on the responsibilty. As it is happens, I only had one wet/dam panel, no big deal.

    Rex
  • Saw an American response to this question a few years ago - cant remember where. The gist of it was that the cellulose fibers where blown in at a density and pressure sufficient to cause expansion if an opening was made in the finished insulated structure.
  • But over time ...?
  • Some of my internal panels have noggins for racking strength. Many of the 180mmm external panels do not, and that is where I am slightly concerned about slump.

    But I have a solution. With all the excess wood around the site, I am cutting noggins from bits and pieces and nailing them about mid-way. Not the full 180mm deep to reduce cold bridging, but sufficient to give the top half of the Warmcell something to support itself.

    Rex
  • Rex,

    very interesting thread. I have seen slumping on damp sprayed warmcel into 150mm voids. It was the fist void they sprayed in the morning and there was a little too much water in the mix. The installer offered to come straight back and sort it out. It happened straight away and you could feel that warmcel was looser and wetter. All the other voids stayed put and felt hard to the touch as they dried. It's a pity that a very good product has got this reputation and I think unfairly so. As your experience shows if the whole panel gets soaked there;s not much anyone can do and I agree that pre-filled panels are problematic in our climate unless the whole set up can be protected (unlikely). Sounds like you have found a good simple solution to ease your fears.
  • Simple question.

    Why can't you blow in dry warmcell?
  • You can - don't know why anyone bothers with the wet?
  • Thank you.
  • As I understand things, if dry blown with scrim covering the walls, it will probably either blow out the scrim, or cause so much bulging of the scrim that it will be impossible to fix the dry lining boards.

    The alternative is to dry line first and then dry fill. But to do this, each vertical drop needs a 100mm hole bored through the dry lining and in the average timber frame house, that will be A LOT of repair work.

    Many of my panels have noggins, so that would mean two fill points for a 600mm width. Additionally, dry blowing Warmcell this way, it is not possible to see if all the voids are filled.

    My t/f structure has many vertical studs, some of them have a gap of only a few cms. Wouldnever be able to get dry blown in.

    Rex
  • I heard they were using Cellulose to insulate Railway carriages in Switzerland now, and they don't seem to be worried about it slumping with all the vibrations if its installed at 65kg/m3.
  • Is that the recommended density? That's double the density they suggest for loose-fill roof ins (0.25 cu m packs @ 8kg ea).
  • Cellulose insulation in trains?
    Locomotive fire standards are exceptionally tough. BS 6583 in many countries, M1 in many more. Can't see cellulose meeting those regs?!
  • 65kg/m3 = normal densest standard (40-65) - can be higher if nec.
  • Have you tried lighting Cellulose? Its great stuff for putting out fires!
  • So are duffel coats but I wouldn't insulate passenger trains with them.....
  • If you try to burn Cellulose with a gas blow-torch it just smolders and then goes out when the gas is turned off. the same blowtorch makes little balls out of Rockwool and Glasswool
  • Smouldering just means burning without flames that's why as a building product something like Warmcell gets a Euroclass C resistance to fire. Rockwool probably gets an A.
    The fire tests for passenger trains require passes in surface spread of flame, fire propagation, smoke emission and toxicity, I imagine it would struggle on all 4
Sign In or Register to comment.